Hiccupping continually, the inebriated and ill-tempered Donner kicks Rudolph’s prosthetic nose across the snowy roof. It goes far before coming to a hard stop at the roof’s edge. Never to be outdone, a wobbly Vixen stumbles forward through the blizzard and hoofs the ball still farther, off the roof and all the way to the peak of the nearby mountaintop. As he stands by impotently and for the most part unseen, the nose-less yet bookish young Rudolph can still enjoy his pride in knowing to say that Vixen has managed to send his still-glowing prosthesis farther than Donner (not more far as his less erudite tormentors might say).
Given that it’s the evening of December 24 and the global trek to deliver gifts has yet to be undertaken, it seems advisable that Santa’s sleigh pullers don’t drink further. For the most part, and when not describing physical distance—and as Rudolph, of course, well knows—further is a stand-in for more or additional or moreover or to a greater extent.
Truth is, we can find plenty of examples of famous writers across the years using farther and further more or less interchangeably. The more that famous writers (mis)use words, the closer their (mis)usages come to acceptance by us all. And, let’s face it, your friends will just stare at you funny if you say you got something right and Stephen King or Jeffrey Archer or Charles Dickens got it wrong. Those wanting to train themselves for precision in what they say are wise to begin their writing careers by restricting their use of farther to physical distance. One could say more, but there’s little point to rambling on further, right?
NEXT MONTH: Uninterested or Disinterested?
To have this and all future tips delivered to your smart phone, subscribe to the monthly bulletin here.